OK after a sarcastic post I should do some more serious stuff.
I have one as yet uncompleted which I was going to call “Good Science, Bad Science” but I think it’s going to turn into a series, I keep turning up more relevant stuff
Then I was going to do one about my current theories, but again several people have turned up several more papers I need to re-read and dig into their references.
See, the beauty of a theory, as opposed to a dogma, is that it changes in the face of new evidence, whereas a dogma alters, ignores or statistically manipulates the evidence to fit. Commonplace in the dietary field. People can make an entire career from inhaling the dogma at an early age and regurgitating it until they retire (or die of a heart attack).
One thing I thought of doing was listing some authorities’ papers in chronological order: it stands out that those doing Real Science change their views significantly over time. Simin Liu is one such, I have high hopes for him now he’s a professor. Frank Hu was another who nearly grasped things, then turned away at the last moment in favour of lipophobia.
Here he is finally “coming out”, aided and abetted by Ron Krauss (so no surprise there then)
Theoretically only the absract is available FOC but I found the pdf here
and I’m now off to read it (I have caffeine and nicotine so will probably be able to comprehend it (grins))
then I’ll hit this one again
I don’t altogether agree with it, they’ve put several carts before the horses IMO, but there’s some good stuff in there to be cross-fertilised with the good stuff I’m currently delving into on a couple more blogs